The Education Secretary has rejected criticism of plans to revamp Ofsted’s grading system for schools with a new “report card” style scale. Unions and the sister of a headteacher who took her own life following an Ofsted inspection have criticised the plans. Bridget Phillipson said she “fundamentally” rejects the idea that giving more information on where schools need to improve is “not something that parents want”.

Schools in England could be graded across a variety of different areas – including attendance and inclusion – using a colour-coded five-point scale. They would receive ratings – from the red coloured “causing concern” to orange coloured “attention needed”, through the green shades of “secure”, “strong” and “exemplary” – for each area of practice under proposals for Ofsted’s new report card system.

The Government announced last year that headline Ofsted grades for overall effectiveness for schools in England would be scrapped. Previously, Ofsted awarded one of four single-phrase inspection judgments: outstanding, good, requires improvement and inadequate. Ms Phillipson said “good” as a judgement has become “too vague to serve its  purpose” and that too many schools are “coasting” to deliver education that is not up to the required standard.

She defended the report cards during a speech at the Centre for Social Justice to launch a a 12-week consultation on the Government’s plans and said she was “delighted to see the debate raging over our reforms”. “On the report cards in particular, I think parents are more than able to understand and to take on board greater information about what’s happening within their children’s school.

“Both in terms of strengths and areas of weakness and where there is further work required on improvement. “So I just fundamentally reject this idea that somehow providing more information shining a light on areas where there is a need for improvement, but also where there is excellence is somehow not something that parents want when all the evidence is clear that they do.”. The reforms follow criticism of the inspection system following the death of headteacher Ruth Perry who took her own life after an Ofsted report downgraded her Caversham Primary School in Reading from the highest to the lowest overall effectiveness rating over safeguarding concerns.

Her sister Professor Julia Waters said that while the new model has some improvements, it “retains many of the dangerous features of the previous system, while introducing a series of changes with potential new risks to the wellbeing of teachers and headteachers”. Prof Waters said: “My sister Ruth Perry died as the result of a rude and intimidating Ofsted inspection, and its disproportionate consequences on her and her school.

“It is two years since Ruth’s death, and a year since Sir Martyn Oliver took charge of Ofsted. “Ofsted says it has listened, but it still does not appear to have adequately learned. “I am worried that this proposal is a rehash of the discredited and dangerous system it is meant to replace.”. Prof Waters said the proposal appears to have fed the single-word judgments “through an online thesaurus”, adding that “other elements of the report card design are ill-thought-through and potentially dangerous”.

Under the proposals from the inspectorate, at least eight areas of a school’s provision could be evaluated and graded – accompanied by short summaries of inspectors’ findings – in a report card for parents. The proposed evaluation areas would be leadership and governance, curriculum, developing teaching, achievement, behaviour and attitudes, attendance, personal development and wellbeing, and inclusion.

Schools which have early years provision or a sixth form would also be graded separately on these areas. Safeguarding would not be graded with the five-point scale and instead it would be assessed as either met or not met under the plans. The proposals have been criticised by Paul Whiteman, general secretary of school leaders’ union NAHT, who said they “suggest an inspectorate determined to hold on to a model of inspection that is long past its sell-by date”.

And Pepe Di’Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said the proposed school report cards “appear to be even worse than the single-word judgments they replace”. Inspectors will look at how well schools support vulnerable and disadvantaged children, including those with special educational needs and disabilities (Send), as part of a new focus on inclusion.

Previously, schools were judged on quality of education, behaviour and attitudes, personal development and leadership and management. In the consultation document, Ofsted said: “We will continue to call out unacceptable practice, as we have always done. That is our duty, and it’s a moral duty as much as a professional one. “But these proposals allow us to highlight poor practice with more precision – pointing laser-like to specific issues, not shining a floodlight on the whole provider.”.