Scientists reveal exactly where Jesus was born - and say it probably WASN'T in Bethlehem
Share:
With Christmas just around the corner, carol concerts and nativity plays will be reminding Christians everywhere about the story of Jesus' birth. However, whether you're singing 'O Little Town of Bethlehem' or dressing your child up as Sheep Number Three, experts say you might be getting the story wrong.
While it is taken as given that Jesus was born on Christmas Day in the town of Bethlehem, this account likely doesn't match the historical reality. In fact, many historians and archaeologists don't believe that Jesus was born at Bethlehem at all. While there is almost no denying that Jesus was a real historical figure, the story laid out in the gospel contains historical details and contradictions which don't quite fit.
The story of Bethlehem, shepherds, wise men, and a manger may have only emerged later as Christians tried to tie Jesus' story into an ancient Jewish prophecy. Instead, some experts suggest that Jesus would have been born 68 miles (175km) away in the small town of Nazareth.
Some archaeologists even suggest that Jesus could have been born in a second Bethlehem just 4 miles (7km) away from Mary and David's hometown. Despite what you might have heard about the Nativity, experts say that Jesus probably wasn't born in the little town of Bethlehem (stock image).
According to the traditional story laid out in Christian belief, Jesus was born in a manger in a town called Bethlehem of Judea. This town, about six miles south of Jerusalem, is now located in a part of the Palestinian West Bank and has become a key point of pilgrimage for Christians around the world.