I look like an ugly potato without my slap, no way would I go makeup free like Pamela Anderson, says Vanessa Feltz
Share:
THERE are not many women who can pull off wearing not a scintilla of make-up on a Hollywood red carpet, but Pamela Anderson is one of them. The former Baywatch star went with minimal touching up at this week’s Golden Globes and looked amazing. Good for her.
If I looked like Pamela, I might not wear make-up, either. But if you’re not born a bobby-dazzler like her, why would you have the bare-faced audacity to go make-up free?. Most women think they look better with make-up, and I certainly wouldn’t sign up to a movement that makes women feel guilty for using cosmetics. That’s much too dictatorial.
It’s as if you are saying: “If you wear foundation and lipstick you’re superficial, you’re fake.”. I am horrified at the idea of make-up shaming. I don’t want men, or other women for that matter, to start judging women for wearing make-up. There shouldn’t be pressure one way or another.
Those pictures of Pamela Anderson brought back some miserable memories for me. A few years ago, BBC Radio 2 organised a publicity photoshoot for some of their presenters and I was invited to take part. To my amazement, the photographer was Bryan Adams, the pop star.
He had a very impressive studio, which was part of his posh home in Knightsbridge, central London. I just pitched up, as instructed. But when I arrived, I was told that for this shoot Bryan wanted a no-make-up look. “OK, don’t panic,” I thought. He probably means make-up that looks like no make-up — so lots of foundation, some powder, some contouring, a very light rim on the inside of the eye and neutral lipstick.